Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Elementary School publishes scientific papers from literature review and research results in the scope of education and learning to SD-an.Dengan research subjects students Elementary Class I-VI and S1 PGSD students in the field of Mathematics, Indonesian, Natural Science, Science Social and Civics. Each submitted manuscript will be reviewed by a best partner who is asked specifically for the field.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

The review process is done to ensure that articles that are accepted and received are just articles that fit the focus of the journal and are the best articles. this process is conducted objectively at the core of a good journal publishing and is conducted by all leading scientific journals. Our reviewers play an important role in maintaining content standards and focus for all scripts. Articles that go in the review follow the procedure outlined below.

Initial evaluation of the manuscript is done by Editors ie First editors do evaluation on all manuscripts. A good and fitting script will be accepted, and that is not good will be returned for repair. The manuscript is rejected at this stage if it is less original (plagiarism) and is outside the focus and scope of the journal. Scientific articles that have bad grammar, less appropriate grammar, and do not follow the template then the article returned for the repair. Those who meet the minimum criteria are usually forwarded for review by at least 2 reviewers.

Review of the journal using double blind review process method. Where peer review and writers do not know each other. So reviewers do not see the article subjectively.

Reviewers are asked to evaluate: - What is the original text - Is the content fit the focus and scope - Is following the code of ethics article writing - Does Have clear results presented and supports the conclusion, and; - Is using the correct references.

The time required for the review process depends on the response of the reviewer. If the results of the two reviewers are different, then the search is most closely approximated by other experts. Akat but, if there is no difference, then used both. If the input of one reviewer is sufficiently convincing the editor, then the decision at this stage to accept, reject or request the author for revision is made. Editor's decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the reviewer, which contains the comments of the reviewer about the contents of the manuscript. the revised text is returned to the editor which is then evaluated for final decision.

In addition to commenting on the script of the article, the reviewer also advises the editor, who is responsible for making the final decision to accept or reject the article.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.